2025 girl name rarity at a glance
The national file represents 1,607,267 published female-name records in 2025. Because the Social Security Administration does not publish names with fewer than five occurrences for a sex in a year, every number below describes the public file rather than every birth that may have occurred.
Our 2025 rarity scale
This scale gives the site a consistent way to separate familiar names from genuinely scarce spellings. It is a practical editorial framework based on the 2025 U.S. file, not an official SSA classification.
Familiar
Ranks #1-500
Uncommon
Ranks #501-1,000
Rare
Outside Top 1,000 with 100+ published births
Very rare
25-99 published births
Exceptionally rare
5-24 published births
Our Very Rare Girl Names guide uses “under 100 births” as an umbrella, so it includes both the 25–99 group and the exceptionally rare 5–24 group.
Rare girl names under 50 births in 2025
There were 14,087 published female spellings with 5–49 births in 2025. That is 81.4% of all published spellings, but only 11.8% of published female-name records. In other words, most spellings live in the long tail even though most babies receive much more familiar names.
Briony
5 births · #15,342
Peak: 2011 · 16 birthsHero
5 births · #15,768
Peak: 2016 · 22 birthsIsabeau
6 births · #13,866
Peak: 2013 · 25 birthsPosy
6 births · #14,513
Peak: 2023 · 14 birthsAnthea
9 births · #10,179
Peak: 1990 · 20 birthsClove
9 births · #10,269
Peak: 2023 · 12 birthsJessamine
10 births · #9,748
Peak: 1997 · 17 birthsCassiopeia
11 births · #8,977
Peak: 2022 · 18 birthsCressida
11 births · #8,987
Peak: 2025 · 11 birthsFleur
11 births · #9,055
Peak: 2021 · 16 birthsElspeth
14 births · #7,600
Peak: 1984 · 39 birthsAraminta
15 births · #7,173
Peak: 2025 · 15 birthsXanthe
15 births · #7,468
Peak: 2025 · 15 birthsCosima
19 births · #6,171
Peak: 2017 · 36 birthsIsolde
20 births · #5,997
Peak: 2007 · 26 birthsClio
25 births · #5,127
Peak: 2015 · 37 birthsCarys
32 births · #4,375
Peak: 2006 · 196 birthsSaskia
33 births · #4,342
Peak: 2024 · 41 birthsDelphine
42 births · #3,592
Peak: 1958 · 348 birthsNiamh
43 births · #3,561
Peak: 2008 · 74 birthsPosey
45 births · #3,441
Peak: 2022 · 54 birthsMaude
46 births · #3,367
Peak: 1888 · 1,396 birthsRare names with the biggest 2025 gains
To reduce noise from tiny counts, this table looks only at names that were outside the 2025 Top 1,000 and had at least 50 published births in both 2024 and 2025. It then ranks them by the largest increase in actual birth count, not by rank movement alone.
| Name | 2024 births | 2025 births | Change | 2025 rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arlett | 119 | 222 | +103 | #1,085 |
| Ailana | 103 | 205 | +102 | #1,135 |
| Calia | 65 | 167 | +102 | #1,335 |
| Esmeray | 57 | 157 | +100 | #1,391 |
| Zhamira | 88 | 184 | +96 | #1,228 |
| Liyana | 147 | 232 | +85 | #1,059 |
| Eliany | 98 | 182 | +84 | #1,235 |
| Naziyah | 54 | 138 | +84 | #1,535 |
| Klover | 115 | 197 | +82 | #1,178 |
| Lorraine | 157 | 238 | +81 | #1,044 |
Rare names with the biggest 2025 declines
The same filter shows the largest year-over-year birth-count declines among names still outside the Top 1,000 in 2025. A one-year drop does not prove a long-term trend, but it is useful context for names that may feel less common than they did recently.
| Name | 2024 births | 2025 births | Change | 2025 rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alexa | 349 | 243 | -106 | #1,029 |
| Jaycee | 307 | 201 | -106 | #1,155 |
| Cattleya | 293 | 187 | -106 | #1,212 |
| Isis | 230 | 128 | -102 | #1,625 |
| Mavie | 236 | 136 | -100 | #1,555 |
| Danae | 170 | 74 | -96 | #2,417 |
| Aubrie | 258 | 163 | -95 | #1,353 |
| Lailah | 221 | 131 | -90 | #1,602 |
| Marjorie | 335 | 246 | -89 | #1,019 |
| Allyson | 290 | 203 | -87 | #1,139 |
Rare names reaching a new published high
These names were outside the Top 1,000 in 2025, had at least 100 births, and reached their strongest published annual count in the 1880–2025 archive. They are still uncommon nationally, but 2025 was a record year for the exact spelling.
Adara
249 births · #1,004
First published: 1979Safa
249 births · #1,007
First published: 1978Meera
246 births · #1,020
First published: 1965Serafina
245 births · #1,024
First published: 1901Ripley
243 births · #1,032
First published: 1988Jovi
241 births · #1,036
First published: 1976Inara
237 births · #1,049
First published: 1998Jubilee
234 births · #1,053
First published: 1975Liyana
232 births · #1,059
First published: 1994Dua
231 births · #1,060
First published: 1993Older rare names making a comeback
Some uncommon names are not new at all. The names below were published before 1950, remain outside the 2025 Top 1,000, and show a clear rise compared with 2015. This is one reason historical data matters: a rare name can be rediscovered rather than invented.
| Name | 2015 births | 2025 births | 2025 rank | Historic peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Junie | 12 | 144 | #1,488 | 2025 · 144 |
| Dove | 17 | 144 | #1,487 | 2025 · 144 |
| Kit | 28 | 208 | #1,127 | 2025 · 208 |
| Rue | 27 | 169 | #1,324 | 2024 · 188 |
| Astra | 11 | 66 | #2,612 | 2022 · 69 |
| Blossom | 41 | 171 | #1,300 | 2025 · 171 |
| Dottie | 40 | 158 | #1,385 | 1943 · 278 |
| Ottilie | 13 | 57 | #2,951 | 2024 · 80 |
| Marnie | 23 | 85 | #2,186 | 1969 · 510 |
| Louella | 42 | 146 | #1,475 | 1932 · 266 |
| Bea | 25 | 83 | #2,218 | 2024 · 89 |
| Mable | 22 | 73 | #2,450 | 1922 · 1,620 |
Names that sound rare but are not especially rare
Style can be misleading. A name may sound celestial, botanical, ancient or futuristic while still being used hundreds or thousands of times a year. We keep these names useful for inspiration, but we do not present them as statistically rare.
Nova
4,657 births · #46
Stella
4,136 births · #52
Wren
1,331 births · #231
Freya
1,746 births · #176
Aurelia
1,056 births · #290
Azalea
1,109 births · #278
Briar
778 births · #400
Athena
2,477 births · #109
Iris
3,729 births · #61
Phoebe
1,885 births · #157
Persephone
372 births · #735
Calliope
682 births · #451
Elara
275 births · #942
Indigo
318 births · #854
What this report can and cannot tell us
The report measures published U.S. use of exact spellings. It does not measure whether a name is culturally rare, rare in another country, rare within a language community or emotionally unique to a family. It also cannot distinguish zero births from one to four births because the national public files suppress counts below five.
Ranks can move sharply near the bottom of the list, so we prefer actual birth counts when describing meaningful change. We also keep subjective style labels separate from measurable popularity. For the full rules, see How We Measure Rare Girl Names and How We Research Girl Names.
